Medical Records Software Comparison Electronic Medical Records Software Comparative Analysis There are over 75 different vendors of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) software applications currently providing solutions to healthcare facilities in the U.S. alone as of 2011 (Ulutas, Ulutas, Nabiyev, 2011). The key design criteria for EMR systems is security (Neupert, Mundie, 2009), usability (James, Garrett, Krevit, 2009) and the ability to be integrated with legacy systems (Agarwal, Milch, Van Kuiken, 2009). This

Electronic Medical Records Management and Personal Privacy Electronic Medical Records Management and the Control of Personal Privacy Information The ethics and security of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) is acting as a catalyst of continual innovation today and will accelerate development in this industry over the next two decades. The continual improvements in technology, security and personalization are also being driven by the need for healthcare providers to stay in HIPAA compliance as

Brands of Electronic Medical Records: Electronic Medical Records (EMR) are computerized medical systems that are created within a healthcare organization that allow the storage, retrieval and alteration of records. In most cases, these systems tend to be part of the local distinctive health information system within an organization that provides care like doctor's surgery or hospital. There are many brands of electronic medical records that are in existence today which are

Selecting the right vendor (background check) Choosing the right vendor can be just as important as the system being setup and the software being utilized. Choosing the right vendor is just as important as choosing the right EMR software. Daniel Ray, in the article, "Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Vendors- Points to Consider," declares the following things are essential in choosing the right vendor for your business: 1. Checking the track record: evaluate

All three systems typically require a practice to install the EHR software onto on-site servers, although they all appear to require only standard "off-the-shelf" hardware, and all of them also offer Application Service Provider (ASP) access as an option. (McKesson, 2010, General Electric Corporation, 2010, Sage 2010). Because all three systems are applications that reside on the practice's hardware, back-up of the server data seems to fall on the shoulders

Staff must be trained to use Electronic Health Records in a way that optimizes the potential benefits of the new technology, while avoiding sloppy habits that not only reduce effectiveness but are even potentially detrimental to the quality of health care (Hartzband & Groopman, 1998). There are literally hundreds of Electronic Health Records applications and products available on the market today. It is up to each organization to choose